Although Jersey has no borrowing why has no one questioned why there has been such a drastic reduction of 22% in the value of our Social Security funds. The strategic reserve has fallen 4% which is a more realistic performance in the current environment.
Although the losses have been in the hundreds of millions, the States said its funds had done better than the FTSE 100 index, which, in comparison, fell 32% in the same period. It is all very well to say it is the markets but this is money that belongs to the Island and it would not appear to have been managed very well - in fact it is mismanagement on a fairly large scale. Any one in charge of losing nearly a quarter of the value of a fund in the private sector would have been sacked. It might have been better had those funds been switched to cash. The recession has been building since January this year. All the press seem to be saying is "oh well". This fund is future pensions. These have to be funded.
Jersey has also embarked on expansion by allowing imported labour into the finance industry. The State has also expanded. So whilst the Jersey authorities are accused of being an oligarchy by others and some as being Thatcherite - this really couldn't be further from the truth. Because really, aside from not borrowing, they have been far more New Labour complete with spin.
For all the talk of there being no recession in Jersey by the local authorities one of the biggest signals that there is is surely a 22% reduction in value of your Social Security fund.
Point and Counterpoint
-
Ian Le Marquand on Talkback noting:
*1) Some recommendations given verbally were left out of the ACPO report
*
Apparently some verbal recommendations mentio...
1 hour ago